CROCIERE v. Escobar

934 So. 2d 510, 2005 WL 1762289
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 27, 2005
Docket3D04-1016
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 934 So. 2d 510 (CROCIERE v. Escobar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
CROCIERE v. Escobar, 934 So. 2d 510, 2005 WL 1762289 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

934 So.2d 510 (2005)

COSTA CROCIERE, S.P.A., Prestige Cruises N.V., Cruise Ships Catering and Services, International N.V., Costa Cruise Lines N.V., L.L.C., Costa Cruise Lines, Inc., and Carnival Corporation d/b/a Carnival Cruise Lines, Appellants,
v.
Ricardo ESCOBAR, Appellee.

No. 3D04-1016.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 27, 2005.

*511 McAlpin & Brais, P.A., Miami, and Richard J. McAlpin, and Barbara J. Conner, Fort Myers; Robert S. Glazier, Miami, for appellants.

Rebecca B. Watford, Miami, for appellee.

Before GREEN, SHEPHERD, and CORTIÑAS, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.061(g); Wedge Hotel Mgmt., (Bahamas), Ltd. v. Meier, 868 So.2d 552, 552 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004)("Wedge's motion to dismiss for forum non conveniens was not filed until May 6, 2002, well past the sixty day time limit of 1.061(g). As Wedge's motion was untimely under the plain language of 1.061(g), we need not address the merits of the arguments raised in the motion.").

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

CARAFFA v. Carnival Corp.
34 So. 3d 127 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
934 So. 2d 510, 2005 WL 1762289, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crociere-v-escobar-fladistctapp-2005.