C.R.O. v. State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services

District Court of Appeal of Florida

C.R.O. v. State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services

573 So. 2d 442, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 668, 1991 WL 9368

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 1, 1991

DocketNo. 89-01851

StatusPublished

This text of 573 So. 2d 442 (C.R.O. v. State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

C.R.O. v. State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services, 573 So. 2d 442, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 668, 1991 WL 9368 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, the mother of G.L.O., Jr., challenges the trial court’s order adjudicating her son dependent. She raises six issues, one of which requires reversal at this time. This issue involves the trial court’s failure to advise the mother of her right to counsel at any point during the dependency proceeding. Since she was not apprised of her right to counsel, the order adjudicating the child dependent and awarding custody must be reversed and remanded. In Interest of D.M.S., 528 So.2d 505 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988).

Reversed and remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and LEHAN and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, the mother of G.L.O., Jr., challenges the trial court’s order adjudicating her son dependent. She raises six issues, one of which requires reversal at this time. This issue involves the trial court’s failure to advise the mother of her right to counsel at any point during the dependency proceeding. Since she was not apprised of her right to counsel, the order adjudicating the child dependent and awarding custody must be reversed and remanded. In Interest of D.M.S., 528 So.2d 505 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988).

Reversed and remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and LEHAN and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

573 So. 2d 442, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 668, 1991 WL 9368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cro-v-state-department-of-health-rehabilitative-services-fladistctapp-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack