C.R.O. v. State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services

573 So. 2d 442, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 668, 1991 WL 9368
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 1, 1991·No. No. 89-01851·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, the mother of G.L.O., Jr., challenges the trial court’s order adjudicating her son dependent. She raises six issues, one of which requires reversal at this time. This issue involves the trial court’s failure to advise the mother of her right to counsel at any point during the dependency proceeding. Since she was not apprised of her right to counsel, the order adjudicating the child dependent and awarding custody must be reversed and remanded. In Interest of D.M.S., 528 So.2d 505 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988).

Reversed and remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and LEHAN and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

C.R.O. v. State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services, 573 So. 2d 442, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 668, 1991 WL 9368 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

573 So. 2d 442 (C.R.O. v. State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Interest of DMS
528 So. 2d 505 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)