Crizelda Viviana Litif v. Infinity Jimenez
This text of Crizelda Viviana Litif v. Infinity Jimenez (Crizelda Viviana Litif v. Infinity Jimenez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-23-00318-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
CRIZELDA VIVIANA LITIF, Appellant,
v.
INFINITY JIMENEZ, Appellee.
On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 10 of Hidalgo County, Texas.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Longoria, Silva, and Peña Memorandum Opinion by Justice Longoria
This cause is before the Court on a joint motion to dismiss the appeal. According
to the motion, the parties have resolved the matter before the Court to their satisfaction
and request the case to be dismissed. Additionally, the parties jointly request that the
Court assess costs to the party that incurred them. The Court, having considered the documents on file and the joint motion to dismiss
the appeal, is of the opinion the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P.
42.1(a). Accordingly, the case is hereby reinstated, the joint motion is granted, and the
appeal is dismissed. In accordance with the joint motion and the apparent agreement
between the parties, costs will be taxed against the party incurring the same. See
id. R. 42.1(d). Because the appeal is dismissed at parties’ request, no motion for
rehearing will be entertained.
Furthermore, appellant’s motion to supplement the record which was previously
carried with the case is now denied as moot.
NORA L. LONGORIA Justice
Delivered and filed on the 15th day of February, 2024.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Crizelda Viviana Litif v. Infinity Jimenez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crizelda-viviana-litif-v-infinity-jimenez-texapp-2024.