Home/Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama/Crittendon v. State

Crittendon v. State

132 So. 3d 27, 2013 WL 6978218, 2013 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 116
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
DecidedNovember 8, 2013
DocketCR-12-1254
StatusPublished

This text of 132 So. 3d 27 (Crittendon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Crittendon v. State, 132 So. 3d 27, 2013 WL 6978218, 2013 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 116 (Ala. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinions

Note from the reporter of decisions: On November 8, 2013, the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals issued an order remanding this case to the circuit court for that court to clarify whether it had granted Rickey Crittendon’s in forma pauperis petition or whether Crittendon had paid the necessary filing fees and then, if Critten-don’s in forma pauperis petition had been granted or the filing fee paid, to determine whether the judge who presided over Critr tendon’s Rule 32, Ala. R.Crim. P., proceeding had represented Crittendon on a previous appeal. Judge Joiner dissented and issued a special writing, which Judge Burke joined.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Jim Walter Homes, Inc.
776 So. 2d 76 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2000)
Ex Parte Cotton
638 So. 2d 870 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1994)
Matter of Sheffield
465 So. 2d 350 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1984)
Wallace v. Wallace
352 So. 2d 1376 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1977)
Hyde v. State
894 So. 2d 808 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
132 So. 3d 27, 2013 WL 6978218, 2013 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crittendon-v-state-alacrimapp-2013.