Crittenden v. Smith

Cherokee Nation Judicial Appeals Tribunal

Crittenden v. Smith

6 Am. Tribal Law 39

CourtCherokee Nation Judicial Appeals Tribunal

DecidedJune 27, 2006

DocketJAT-04-14

StatusPublished

This text of 6 Am. Tribal Law 39 (Crittenden v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Cherokee Nation Judicial Appeals Tribunal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crittenden v. Smith, 6 Am. Tribal Law 39 (cherokeeapp 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Now on this 27th day of June, 2006, the Court after reviewing the file and records of these proceedings finds and orders:

The Court set a detailed scheduling order after Petitioner’s request to move this case forward. The Petitioner failed to comply with the Court’s scheduling order.

1. Petitioner did not respond to pretrial discovery requests.

2. Petitioner failed to co-operate with the .Respondents attorney in preparation of the Pre-Trial Order as ordered by the Court on March 30, 2006.

3. Petitioner failed to submit names of witnesses and/or exhibits that -would substantiate any of the Petitioner’s claims.

4. Petitioner failed to appear at the Pre-Trial Conference on June 8, 2006 without excuse.

The Court further finds these proceedings should be dismissed without prejudice and that the Petitioner acted in bad faith with respect to orders of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI