Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Critsley v. State

Critsley v. State

573 So. 2d 167, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 197, 1991 WL 2771
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 16, 1991
DocketNo. 89-3142
StatusPublished

This text of 573 So. 2d 167 (Critsley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Critsley v. State, 573 So. 2d 167, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 197, 1991 WL 2771 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The main appeal is per curiam affirmed. The only issue meriting discussion is contained in the cross appeal. The- state in its brief argues that the trial court erred in failing to award restitution to the victim’s family for funeral expenses. The amount of that expense is $1,226.48. Under section 775.089(2)(d), Florida Statutes (1989), such an expense is assessable as restitution. Accordingly, we reverse on this issue and remand for further proceedings.

AFFIRMED IN PART; CROSS APPEAL REVERSED.

LETTS and WARNER, JJ., concur. ANSTEAD, J., concurs specially with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Moriarty
742 P.2d 704 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1987)
State v. Mayberry
415 N.W.2d 644 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1987)
Durrett v. State
530 So. 2d 483 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
573 So. 2d 167, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 197, 1991 WL 2771, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/critsley-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.