Crites v. Pillmore-Anderegg Co.
This text of 91 Ohio St. (N.S.) 412 (Crites v. Pillmore-Anderegg Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment reversed. See journal entry.
It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said court of appeals be, and the same hereby is, reversed; for the reason that, on the measure of damages the trial court erred in its general charge and in directing the jury not to consider the cost of installation and mainte[413]*413nance of the machines in controversy; the measure of damages having been fixed by the contract, to-wit: the loss sustained thereunder by the plaintiff below for its breach, less the diminution in the reasonable cost of installation and maintenance.
It is therefore considered by this court that the verdict be, and the same is, set aside and a new trial granted at the cost of the defendant in error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
91 Ohio St. (N.S.) 412, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crites-v-pillmore-anderegg-co-ohio-1915.