Crites v. Aa1 Rock Salt Chemicals Co.

California Court of Appeal

Crites v. Aa1 Rock Salt Chemicals Co.

275 P. 1118, 97 Cal. App. 695, 1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 31

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedMarch 20, 1929

DocketDocket No. 6210.

StatusPublished

This text of 275 P. 1118 (Crites v. Aa1 Rock Salt Chemicals Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crites v. Aa1 Rock Salt Chemicals Co., 275 P. 1118, 97 Cal. App. 695, 1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 31 (Cal. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Defendants appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff for $3,800 in an action brought to recover said sum alleged to be due him for salary as president.

[1] Defendants contend that there was not sufficient evidence to sustain the findings, that the trial court erred in certain rulings on the admission of evidence and also that it erred in denying defendants' motion for nonsuit interposed at the conclusion of plaintiff's case.

However, there was substantial evidence to sustain the findings, there were no prejudicial errors in the rulings on the admission of evidence, and the motion for nonsuit was properly denied.

Judgment affirmed.

Houser, Acting P.J., and York, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Defendants appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff for $3,800 in an action brought to recover said sum alleged to be due him for salary as president.

[1] Defendants contend that there was not sufficient evidence to sustain the findings, that the trial court erred in certain rulings on the admission of evidence and also that it erred in denying defendants' motion for nonsuit interposed at the conclusion of plaintiff's case.

However, there was substantial evidence to sustain the findings, there were no prejudicial errors in the rulings on the admission of evidence, and the motion for nonsuit was properly denied.

Judgment affirmed.

Houser, Acting P.J., and York, J., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

275 P. 1118, 97 Cal. App. 695, 1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 31, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crites-v-aa1-rock-salt-chemicals-co-calctapp-1929.