Criswell v. Mansfield
This text of 250 F. App'x 320 (Criswell v. Mansfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
James B. Criswell appeals the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, which affirmed the Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision denying his claim for an effective date prior to August 21, 1997, for a 50% combined disability rating for his service-connected cold-injury residuals of the hands and feet. Criswell v. Nicholson, 20 Vet.App. 501 (2006). Because we lack authority to review either “a challenge to a factual determination” or “a challenge to a law or regulation as applied to the facts of a particular case” absent a constitutional issue, 38 U.S.C. § 7292(d)(2), we dismiss his appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
250 F. App'x 320, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/criswell-v-mansfield-cafc-2007.