Criswell v. King

791 A.2d 1153, 568 Pa. 36, 2002 Pa. LEXIS 430
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 12, 2002
DocketAppeal No. 348 MAL 2001
StatusPublished

This text of 791 A.2d 1153 (Criswell v. King) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Criswell v. King, 791 A.2d 1153, 568 Pa. 36, 2002 Pa. LEXIS 430 (Pa. 2002).

Opinion

[37]*37 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 12th day of March, 2002, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is granted limited to the following issue: Whether Petitioner was required to object to the verdict prior the discharge of the jury where the verdict was not inconsistent?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
791 A.2d 1153, 568 Pa. 36, 2002 Pa. LEXIS 430, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/criswell-v-king-pa-2002.