Criswell v. Boyle

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Criswell v. Boyle

423 So. 2d 979, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28673

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 14, 1982

DocketNo. AJ-207

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 423 So. 2d 979 (Criswell v. Boyle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Criswell v. Boyle, 423 So. 2d 979, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28673 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

There being an insufficient record upon which to determine whether there is reversible error in the trial court’s ruling, we affirm. However, Appellants may supplement the record with those portions of the trial court’s proceedings tending to support their arguments on appeal. Fla.R.App.P. 9.200(f)(2). Such supplementation shall be done within the time allowed for a petition for rehearing.

ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., C.J., and McCORD and MILLS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

There being an insufficient record upon which to determine whether there is reversible error in the trial court’s ruling, we affirm. However, Appellants may supplement the record with those portions of the trial court’s proceedings tending to support their arguments on appeal. Fla.R.App.P. 9.200(f)(2). Such supplementation shall be done within the time allowed for a petition for rehearing.

ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., C.J., and McCORD and MILLS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

423 So. 2d 979, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28673, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/criswell-v-boyle-fladistctapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack