Cristobal Galvan-Cerna v. State

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-12-00324-CR Style: Cristobal Galvan Cerna v The State of Texas Date motion filed*: January 11, 2013 Type of motion: Motion to Abate Proceedings Party filing motion: Appellant Document to be filed:

Is appeal accelerated? No

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted If document is to be filed, document due:  Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time  Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: _____________________________________ Because appellant fails to state that the missing proceedings were previously designated for inclusion in the record and the clerk’s record contains no copy of the request for preparation of the reporter’s record, the record was complete when filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.6(a)(1), (b)(1), (2), (3), (d), 35.3(b)(2). Nevertheless, if relevant portions of the reporter’s record have been omitted, appellant “may by letter direct the official court reporter to prepare, certify, and file in the appellate court a supplemental reporter’s record containing the omitted items.” TEX. R. APP. P. 34.6(d). However, any request for a supplemental record will not effect the deadline for filing appellant’s brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.6(a)(1), (b)(1), 35.3(b)(2), 38.6(a).

Judge's signature: /s/ Jim Sharp  Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: January 23, 2013

November 7, 2008 Revision