Cristo Bro's v. Troy Urban Renewal Agency
499 N.E.2d 873, 68 N.Y.2d 819, 507 N.Y.S.2d 619, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 20453
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division (116 AD2d 793).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone and Hancock, Jr.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cristo Bro's v. Troy Urban Renewal Agency, 499 N.E.2d 873, 68 N.Y.2d 819, 507 N.Y.S.2d 619, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 20453 (N.Y. 1986).
499 N.E.2d 873 (Cristo Bro's v. Troy Urban Renewal Agency) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Abramoski v. State of New York
146 A.D.3d 1063 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
4430 North Bailey, Inc. v. Town of Amherst
9 A.D.3d 853 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Della Villa v. Constantino
246 A.D.2d 867 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)