Cristancho v. Village Homes in Bonaventure Homeowners Ass'n
580 So. 2d 658, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5086, 1991 WL 92955
Opinions
We reverse the order dismissing this case under rule 1.420(e) for failure to pros[659] ecute. We conclude that plaintiffs’ notice of deposition and request to produce, filed six days before the lapse of one year, precluded such a dismissal because these discovery requests constitute “activity by filing of pleadings * * * or otherwise” within the meaning of rule 1.420(e).
REVERSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cristancho v. Village Homes in Bonaventure Homeowners Ass'n, 580 So. 2d 658, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5086, 1991 WL 92955 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).
580 So. 2d 658 (Cristancho v. Village Homes in Bonaventure Homeowners Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Allen v. Orlando Regional Medical Center
709 So. 2d 168 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)