Cristancho v. Village Homes in Bonaventure Homeowners Ass'n

516 So. 2d 102, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2767, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11418, 1987 WL 2272
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 9, 1987
DocketNo. 4-86-2974
StatusPublished

This text of 516 So. 2d 102 (Cristancho v. Village Homes in Bonaventure Homeowners Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cristancho v. Village Homes in Bonaventure Homeowners Ass'n, 516 So. 2d 102, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2767, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11418, 1987 WL 2272 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial judge correctly concluded that the second amended complaint fails to state a cause of action. However appellants have satisfied us that if given the opportunity they could plead sufficient ultimate facts to support a proper cause of action. Therefore we reverse the trial court’s order of dismissal with prejudice and remand this cause with instructions to permit appellants to file a third amended complaint.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

DOWNEY, DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
516 So. 2d 102, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2767, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11418, 1987 WL 2272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cristancho-v-village-homes-in-bonaventure-homeowners-assn-fladistctapp-1987.