Crista Ramos v. Chad Wolf

Ninth Circuit

Crista Ramos v. Chad Wolf

59 F.4th 1010

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 10, 2023

Docket18-16981

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 59 F.4th 1010 (Crista Ramos v. Chad Wolf) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crista Ramos v. Chad Wolf, 59 F.4th 1010 (9th Cir. 2023).

Pincite

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 10 2023 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CRISTA RAMOS; CRISTINA MORALES; No. 18-16981 BENJAMIN ZEPEDA; ORLANDO ZEPEDA; JUAN EDUARDO AYALA D.C. No. 3:18-cv-01554-EMC FLORES; ELSY YOLANDA FLORES DE Northern District of California, AYALA; MARIA JOSE AYALA FLORES; San Francisco HNAIDA CENEMAT; WILNA DESTIN; RILYA SALARY; SHERIKA BLANC; ORDER IMARA AMPIE; MAZIN AHMED; HIWAIDA ELARABI,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

CHAD F. WOLF, Secretary of Homeland Security; KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Deputy Secretary of Homeland Security; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendants-Appellants.

MURGUIA, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that

this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)

and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion is vacated. Judges Owens and H.A. Thomas did not participate in the deliberations or

vote in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI