Crist, Warden, Et Al. v. Cline Et Al.

434 U.S. 980
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided December 12, 1977·No. 76-1200·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

C. A. 9th Cir. [Probable jurisdiction postponed, 430 U. S. 982.] Case restored to calendar for reargument. Counsel requested to brief and discuss during oral argument the following questions:

[981]*9811. Is the rule heretofore applied in the federal courts — that jeopardy attaches in jury trials when the jury is sworn — constitutionally mandated?

2. Should this Court hold that the Constitution does not require jeopardy to attach in any trial — state or federal, jury or nonjury — until the first witness is sworn?

The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief expressing the views of the United States on each of these questions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Crist, Warden, Et Al. v. Cline Et Al., 434 U.S. 980 (1977).

434 U.S. 980 (Crist, Warden, Et Al. v. Cline Et Al.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Koenig v. State
497 So. 2d 875 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
United States v. Jo Ann Williams
622 F.2d 830 (Fifth Circuit, 1980)