Crist v. Kijakazi

CourtDistrict Court, D. Nebraska
DecidedAugust 3, 2021
Docket8:20-cv-00096
StatusUnknown

This text of Crist v. Kijakazi (Crist v. Kijakazi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nebraska primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Crist v. Kijakazi, (D. Neb. 2021).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

ACACIA C.,

Plaintiff, 8:20-CV-96 vs. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration,1

Defendant.

This matter is before the Court upon the plaintiff’s Motion for Award of Attorney Fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). Filing 20. The defendant does not object to the plaintiff’s requested fees and expenses in the amount of $2,853.69 (filing 20-2); which represents 10.8 hours of work in 2020 at a rate of $207.78 per hour and 0.5 hours of work in 2021 at a rate of $212.86 per hour for attorney Wes Kappelman, and 1.5 hours of work in 2020 at a rate of $207.78 per hour and 0.9 hours of work in 2021 at a rate of $212.86 for attorney Timothy Cuddigan.2 Filing 20-1; filing 24. The defendant also does not object to the plaintiff’s recovery of her filing fee in the amount of $400.00. Filing 24. The Court has determined that the plaintiff was the prevailing party in this action, as the Commissioner’s decision was reversed and the case

1 Kilolo Kijakazi is now the Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration and has been substituted as a party pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(c). Filing 23. 2 The maximum hourly fee of $125 specified in 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(D)(2)(A) was adjusted to account for inflation. See filing 22-1 at 2-3. remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings; that the application for fees was filed in a timely fashion;3 and that the position of the Commissioner was not substantially justified because the administrative law judge made findings that were not supported by substantial evidence. See Koss v. Sullivan, 982 F.2d 1226 (8th Cir. 1993). Therefore, the plaintiff is entitled to an award of attorney fees. Further, the plaintiff is entitled to recovery of her filing fee in the amount of $400.00, to be paid out of the Judgment Fund administered by the Department of Justice.

IT IS ORDERED: 1. The plaintiff’s Motion for Award of Attorney Fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) (filing 20) is granted.

2. By separate document, the Court shall enter judgment for the plaintiff and against the defendant providing that the plaintiff is awarded attorney fees of $2,853.69, and costs of $400.00, for a total of $3,253.69.

3 An Equal Access to Justice Act application based on a district court judgment remanding a case pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) must be filed no later than 30 days after the sentence four judgment has been entered and the appeal period has run such that the judgment is no longer appealable. See Pottsmith v. Barnhart, 306 F.3d 526, 527-28 (8th Cir. 2002); see also Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 302 (1993); Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89, 94-97 (1991). 3. That sum shall be sent to plaintiff's counsel, Mr. Kappelman, who shall be responsible for remitting to Mr. Cuddigan his portion of the award.

Dated this 3rd day of August, 2021.

BY T E COU a" [hh Wenn J fh n M. Gerrard IAited States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Crist v. Kijakazi, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crist-v-kijakazi-ned-2021.