Crispino v. Marino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Crispino v. Marino

32 A.D.2d 794, 302 N.Y.S.2d 723, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3810

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 9, 1969

StatusPublished

This text of 32 A.D.2d 794 (Crispino v. Marino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crispino v. Marino, 32 A.D.2d 794, 302 N.Y.S.2d 723, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3810 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

In consolidated proceedings, proceeding No. 1 being to invalidate petitions designating appellant Marino as a candidate in the Republican Party Primary Election to be held on June 17, 1969 for nomination for the public office of Councilman at Large for the Borough of Brooklyn, City of New York, and for an injunction, and proceeding No. 2 being to validate said designating petitions, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered June 6, 1969, which (1) declared said designating petitions null and void and enjoined the respondent Board of Elections accordingly and (2) dismissed proceeding No. 2. Order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Appellants are granted leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals. Questions of law have arisen which ought to be reviewed. Beldock, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Benjamin and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In consolidated proceedings, proceeding No. 1 being to invalidate petitions designating appellant Marino as a candidate in the Republican Party Primary Election to be held on June 17, 1969 for nomination for the public office of Councilman at Large for the Borough of Brooklyn, City of New York, and for an injunction, and proceeding No. 2 being to validate said designating petitions, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered June 6, 1969, which (1) declared said designating petitions null and void and enjoined the respondent Board of Elections accordingly and (2) dismissed proceeding No. 2. Order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Appellants are granted leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals. Questions of law have arisen which ought to be reviewed. Beldock, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Benjamin and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

32 A.D.2d 794, 302 N.Y.S.2d 723, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3810, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crispino-v-marino-nyappdiv-1969.