Crispin v. Crispin

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Crispin v. Crispin

411 So. 2d 218, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19194

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 9, 1982

DocketNos. 81-755, 81-1573

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 411 So. 2d 218 (Crispin v. Crispin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crispin v. Crispin, 411 So. 2d 218, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19194 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

From the record presented for review, we conclude that reasonable persons could differ as to the propriety of the action taken by the trial court and, therefore, cannot find that the trial court abused its discretion. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980). Additionally, contrary to appellant’s contention, the trial court did not, ipso facto, abuse its discretion by awarding attorneys’ fees in an amount less than the expert testimony offered by the appellant, notwithstanding that appellee offered no opposing expert testimony on that issue. Fatoiitis v. Fatolitis, 271 So.2d 227 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

From the record presented for review, we conclude that reasonable persons could differ as to the propriety of the action taken by the trial court and, therefore, cannot find that the trial court abused its discretion. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980). Additionally, contrary to appellant’s contention, the trial court did not, ipso facto, abuse its discretion by awarding attorneys’ fees in an amount less than the expert testimony offered by the appellant, notwithstanding that appellee offered no opposing expert testimony on that issue. Fatoiitis v. Fatolitis, 271 So.2d 227 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

411 So. 2d 218, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crispin-v-crispin-fladistctapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack