Crispin James Harmel v. State
This text of Crispin James Harmel v. State (Crispin James Harmel v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
JUDGMENT RENDERED FEBRUARY 26, 2020
NO. 03-18-00381-CR
Crispin James Harmel, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
APPEAL FROM THE 368TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, BAKER, AND KELLY AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY
This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction rendered by the trial court. Having reviewed
the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in
the judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction. Because
appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Crispin James Harmel v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crispin-james-harmel-v-state-texapp-2020.