Crisp v. Hartman

Missouri Court of Appeals

Crisp v. Hartman

471 S.W.3d 398, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 995, 2015 WL 5714861

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 29, 2015·No. WD 77295 & WD 77326·Published

Opinion

[399] ORDER

Per Curiam:

Kathleen Crisp appeals the circuit court’s judgment awarding her $7,290.75 plus pre-judgment interest on her claim for breach of contracts and denying her claims for quantum meruit and tortious interference with contracts. Jason Hartman, Platinum Properties Investor Network, Inc., Karen Karanickolas, and Brittney Roberts cross-appeal claiming that Karanickolas and Roberts are not liable under the contracts and that Crisp’s damages should be limited to $750.00. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[399] ORDER

Per Curiam:

Kathleen Crisp appeals the circuit court’s judgment awarding her $7,290.75 plus pre-judgment interest on her claim for breach of contracts and denying her claims for quantum meruit and tortious interference with contracts. Jason Hartman, Platinum Properties Investor Network, Inc., Karen Karanickolas, and Brittney Roberts cross-appeal claiming that Karanickolas and Roberts are not liable under the contracts and that Crisp’s damages should be limited to $750.00. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Crisp v. Hartman, 471 S.W.3d 398, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 995, 2015 WL 5714861 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

471 S.W.3d 398 (Crisp v. Hartman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.