Crisp v. Crisp

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Crisp v. Crisp

496 S.E.2d 379, 347 N.C. 659, 1998 N.C. LEXIS 102

Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided March 6, 1998·No. No. 323A97·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

As to the issue presented by defendant’s appeal based on the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals, the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed. As to the additional issues presented by this Court’s having allowed plaintiff’s petition for a writ of certiorari, we conclude that certiorari was improvidently allowed.

AFFIRMED IN PART; CERTIORARI IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED IN PART.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

As to the issue presented by defendant’s appeal based on the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals, the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed. As to the additional issues presented by this Court’s having allowed plaintiff’s petition for a writ of certiorari, we conclude that certiorari was improvidently allowed.

AFFIRMED IN PART; CERTIORARI IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED IN PART.

Crisp v. Crisp, 496 S.E.2d 379, 347 N.C. 659, 1998 N.C. LEXIS 102 (N.C. 1998).

Pincite

496 S.E.2d 379 (Crisp v. Crisp) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.