Crisman v. State
248 S.W. 343, 93 Tex. Crim. 393, 1923 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 393
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 14, 1923·No. No. 7643.·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Upon conviction for' burglary, punishment was assessed against appellant at twelve years in the penitentiary.
No bills of exception appear in the record, and no statement of facts accompanies the transcript. Nothing is before us for review. Notwithstanding the heaviest penalty permitted upon conviction for ordinary burglary was assessed against appellant, we must presume the facts justified it.
The judgment must be affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Crisman v. State, 248 S.W. 343, 93 Tex. Crim. 393, 1923 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 393 (Tex. 1923).
248 S.W. 343 (Crisman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Blackmarr v. City Court of Salt Lake City
38 P.2d 725 (Utah Supreme Court, 1934)