Criscione v. Kavanaugh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Criscione v. Kavanaugh

138 A.D.2d 667, 526 N.Y.S.2d 781, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3280

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 28, 1988

StatusPublished

This text of 138 A.D.2d 667 (Criscione v. Kavanaugh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Criscione v. Kavanaugh, 138 A.D.2d 667, 526 N.Y.S.2d 781, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3280 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to foreclose a mortgage on real property, the defendant Stephen Kavanaugh appeals from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gowan, J.), entered February 11, 1987, which, inter alia, upon granting the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, is in favor of the plaintiff and against him in the principal sum of $170,816.23; and (2) an order of the same court, entered March 5, 1987, which denied his motion for reargument and renewal.

Ordered that the appeals are dismissed, with costs.

On December 4, 1987, upon the consent of the appellant and the plaintiff, an order was issued by the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gowan, J.), inter alia, discontinuing this action. Accordingly, the appeals have been rendered academic. Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Lawrence and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to foreclose a mortgage on real property, the defendant Stephen Kavanaugh appeals from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gowan, J.), entered February 11, 1987, which, inter alia, upon granting the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, is in favor of the plaintiff and against him in the principal sum of $170,816.23; and (2) an order of the same court, entered March 5, 1987, which denied his motion for reargument and renewal.

Ordered that the appeals are dismissed, with costs.

On December 4, 1987, upon the consent of the appellant and the plaintiff, an order was issued by the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gowan, J.), inter alia, discontinuing this action. Accordingly, the appeals have been rendered academic. Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Lawrence and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

138 A.D.2d 667, 526 N.Y.S.2d 781, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3280, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/criscione-v-kavanaugh-nyappdiv-1988.