Crisanto Ragasa v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Crisanto Ragasa v. Eric Holder, Jr.. Read the opinion of the Court — 752 F.3d 1173
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 4, 2014·No. 12-72262·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CRISANTO CARINO RAGASA, No. 12-72262 Petitioner, Agency No. v. A037-485-221

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, ORDER Respondent.

Filed June 4, 2014

Before: Michael Daly Hawkins, M. Margaret McKeown, and Carlos T. Bea, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The government’s unopposed motion to amend the opinion is granted. Accordingly, the opinion filed April 28, 2014, 2014 WL 1661491, is amended as follows:

At page 9 of the slip opinion, lines 13–15; 2014 WL 1661491, at *2, the sentence “Because the government has not carried its burden of proving Ragasa’s removability by clear and convincing evidence, we grant the petition and vacate the order of removal.” shall be changed to “Because the government has not carried its burden of proving Ragasa’s removability by clear and convincing evidence, we 2 RAGASA V. HOLDER

grant the petition, vacate the order of removal, and remand this case to the BIA with instructions to terminate Ragasa’s removal proceedings.”

At page 9 of the slip opinion, line 18; 2014 WL 1661491, at *3, the sentence “PETITION GRANTED.” shall be changed to “PETITION GRANTED; REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Crisanto Ragasa v. Eric Holder, Jr., (9th Cir. 2014).

Crisanto Ragasa v. Eric Holder, Jr. (Crisanto Ragasa v. Eric Holder, Jr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Crisanto Ragasa v. Eric Holder, Jr.
752 F.3d 1173 (Ninth Circuit, 2014)