Criollo v. Department of Business & Professional Regulation
This text of 73 So. 3d 339 (Criollo v. Department of Business & Professional Regulation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Upon consideration of appellee’s confession of error, the final order is reversed and the cause is remanded with directions to enter a new order which either accepts the penalty recommendation of the Administrative Law Judge or reimposes the increased penalty stating with particularity the reasons for increasing the penalty as required by section 120.57(1)(l), Florida Statutes (2010). See Shah v. Dep’t of Health, 804 So.2d 615 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
73 So. 3d 339, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 17242, 2011 WL 5120223, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/criollo-v-department-of-business-professional-regulation-fladistctapp-2011.