Criollo v. Department of Business & Professional Regulation

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Criollo v. Department of Business & Professional Regulation

73 So. 3d 339, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 17242, 2011 WL 5120223

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 31, 2011·No. No. 1D11-2182·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of appellee’s confession of error, the final order is reversed and the cause is remanded with directions to enter a new order which either accepts the penalty recommendation of the Administrative Law Judge or reimposes the increased penalty stating with particularity the reasons for increasing the penalty as required by section 120.57(1)(l), Florida Statutes (2010). See Shah v. Dep’t of Health, 804 So.2d 615 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).

DAVIS, VAN NORTWICK, and ROWE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of appellee’s confession of error, the final order is reversed and the cause is remanded with directions to enter a new order which either accepts the penalty recommendation of the Administrative Law Judge or reimposes the increased penalty stating with particularity the reasons for increasing the penalty as required by section 120.57(1)(l), Florida Statutes (2010). See Shah v. Dep’t of Health, 804 So.2d 615 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).

DAVIS, VAN NORTWICK, and ROWE, JJ., concur.

Criollo v. Department of Business & Professional Regulation, 73 So. 3d 339, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 17242, 2011 WL 5120223 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

73 So. 3d 339 (Criollo v. Department of Business & Professional Regulation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related