Cringan, Watkins & Co. v. Smith

76 Ga. 49
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 12, 1886
StatusPublished

This text of 76 Ga. 49 (Cringan, Watkins & Co. v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cringan, Watkins & Co. v. Smith, 76 Ga. 49 (Ga. 1886).

Opinion

Blandeord, Justice.

This was a claim case. The plaintiff proved that the defendant in fi.fa. inherited the land levied on from his father; that in 1879 it was apportioned to him, and he. went into possession. It was further shown by the tenant in possession that he rented the land from I. T. Smith, and he thought the land belonged to L. W. Perdue, defendant in execution ; that he never heard that it belonged [50]*50to Perdue’s wife until this case started. The. plaintiff having closed, the court dismissed the levy, on motion oi claimant’s counsel, and this is excepted to by plaintiffs, and error is assigned thereon.

We think the plaintiff in execution made such a case by his proofs as to put the claimant upon proof of liis title; title was shown to be in defendant in execution. The tenant of the claimant always understood that the land belonged to defendant in execution until after this litigation arose. Now let the claimant step to the front and show his title; if be fails to do so, the land is subject. So it follows that the judgment of the court dismissing the levy is error.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
76 Ga. 49, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cringan-watkins-co-v-smith-ga-1886.