Criner v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Criner v. State

1929 OK CR 234, 278 P. 360, 43 Okla. Crim. 300, 1929 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 253

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJune 15, 1929

DocketNo. A-6760.

StatusPublished

This text of 1929 OK CR 234 (Criner v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Criner v. State, 1929 OK CR 234, 278 P. 360, 43 Okla. Crim. 300, 1929 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 253 (Okla. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Tbe plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the district court of Carter county for the crime of forgery in the second degree and his punishment fixed at imprisonment in the state penitentiary for a term of one year.

The record discloses that at the time charged defendant passed a forged check in the sum of $5 and received in exchange merchandise and cash. The defendant offered no testimony. The judgment was rendered in March, 1927, and the appeal was lodged in this court in September, 1927. No briefs in support of the appeal have been filed, and no appearance for oral argument was made at the time the case was submitted. No fundamental or jurisdictional error is apparent.

The case is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Tbe plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the district court of Carter county for the crime of forgery in the second degree and his punishment fixed at imprisonment in the state penitentiary for a term of one year.

The record discloses that at the time charged defendant passed a forged check in the sum of $5 and received in exchange merchandise and cash. The defendant offered no testimony. The judgment was rendered in March, 1927, and the appeal was lodged in this court in September, 1927. No briefs in support of the appeal have been filed, and no appearance for oral argument was made at the time the case was submitted. No fundamental or jurisdictional error is apparent.

The case is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1929 OK CR 234, 278 P. 360, 43 Okla. Crim. 300, 1929 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/criner-v-state-oklacrimapp-1929.