Crine v. Borneman

9 N.Y. St. Rep. 846
New York Supreme Court·Decided June 18, 1887·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The terms on which leave was given to amend the complaint on payment of all costs of the action were too severe. To meet the ends of justice in the case all that was required was to reimburse the defendant for the costs of the trial and the costs of opposing the motion. The amount required to be paid should be reduced to the trial fee, the disbursements on the trial, including witness’ fees and ten dollars costs of opposing the motion, without costs of the appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Crine v. Borneman, 9 N.Y. St. Rep. 846 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1887).

9 N.Y. St. Rep. 846 (Crine v. Borneman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.