Crimmins v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Oregon·Decided September 29, 2023·No. 3:22-cv-00352·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

DOLLENE C. Civil No. 3:22-cv-00352-SB Plaintiff, VS., ORDER TO PAY EAJA FEES KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Comissioner Social Security, Defendant. BECKERMAN, U.S. Magistrate Judge:

Following my review of Plaintiff's Motion and supporting documentation, and after consideration of Defendant’s response, and pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 USS.C. § 2412, $14,084.44 is awarded to Plaintiff in care of her attorney, Nancy J. Meserow, and the check for EAJA fees shall be made payable to Nancy J. Meserow, based upon Plaintiff's assignment of these amounts to Plaintiff's attorney Nancy J. Meserow, subject to the satisfaction of Plaintiff's debts, if any, under Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S. Ct. 2521 (2010); and in addition, Plaintiff is awarded $20.00 for postage expenses, so that the total amount awarded equals $14,104.44. Any check issued for EAJA fees or for expenses shall be sent to Plaintiff in care of her attorney, Nancy J. Meserow, at her office, located at: Law Office of Nancy J. Meserow, 7540 SW Slst Ave., Portland, OR 97219. IT ISSO ORDERED.

Dated this 29th day of September, 2023 fy 7 SyaticF (ficerrmar HON. STACIE F.BECKERMAN U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE ORDER to pay EAJA fees- 3:22-cv-00352-SB □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□ □□□□

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Crimmins v. Commissioner Social Security Administration, (D. Or. 2023).

Crimmins v. Commissioner Social Security Administration (Crimmins v. Commissioner Social Security Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Astrue v. Ratliff
560 U.S. 586 (Supreme Court, 2010)