Crim v. Crim
134 P. 13, 66 Or. 258, 1913 Ore. LEXIS 369
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
This is a suit by Jessie E. Crim against John L. Crim to dissolve the marriage contract existing between them. From a decree granting the divorce in plaintiff’s favor, the defendant appeals. No good purpose will be subserved by quoting from or commenting upon the testimony, a careful examination of which convinces us that the plaintiff is not free from fault.
[259]*259This being so, the decree should be reversed and the suit dismissed, and it is so ordered.
Reversed: Suit Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Crim v. Crim, 134 P. 13, 66 Or. 258, 1913 Ore. LEXIS 369 (Or. 1913).
134 P. 13 (Crim v. Crim) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Parks v. Parks
187 P.2d 145 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1947)
Hollingworth v. Hollingworth
145 P.2d 466 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1943)
Douglas v. Douglas
99 P.2d 479 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1940)
Billion v. Billion
3 P.2d 1113 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1931)
Carmichael v. Carmichael
211 P. 916 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1923)
Hawley v. Hawley
199 P. 589 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1921)
Crumbley v. Crumbley
186 P. 423 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1920)
Hengen v. Hengen
166 P. 525 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1917)
Ream v. Ream
158 P. 670 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1916)