Crihfield v. Peabody Coal Co.

310 F. App'x 608
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 6, 2009·No. No. 08-1652·Published

Opinion

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Leon Crihfield seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-945 (2006). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. Crihfield v. Peabody Coal Co., No. 07-0670-BLA (B.R.B. May 14, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Crihfield v. Peabody Coal Co., 310 F. App'x 608 (4th Cir. 2009).

310 F. App'x 608 (Crihfield v. Peabody Coal Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 901-945
30 U.S.C. § 901-945
§ 901
30 U.S.C. § 901