Crigler & Crigler Co. v. Laramore
This text of 88 S.E. 901 (Crigler & Crigler Co. v. Laramore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The suit was upon a promissory note for the purchase-price of whisky. The traveling representative of the plaintiff personally took the defendant’s order for the whisky in Albany, Georgia, and the whisky was later shipped to the defendant by express from Covington, Kentucky, to Albany, Ga. At the time the order was given, the defendant stated to the plaintiff’s representative that he was buying the whisky for the purpose of selling it in Georgia in violation of the prohibition law: Held, that the contract was based upon an immoral and illegal consideration, and could not be enforced.
2. The court, sitting by consent without the intervention of a jury, did not err in rendering a judgment in favor of the defendant.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
88 S.E. 901, 18 Ga. App. 132, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crigler-crigler-co-v-laramore-gactapp-1916.