Crigler & Crigler Co. v. Laramore

88 S.E. 901, 18 Ga. App. 132, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 167
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided May 19, 1916·No. 6895·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Broyles, J.

1. The suit was upon a promissory note for the purchase-price of whisky. The traveling representative of the plaintiff personally took the defendant’s order for the whisky in Albany, Georgia, and the whisky was later shipped to the defendant by express from Covington, Kentucky, to Albany, Ga. At the time the order was given, the defendant stated to the plaintiff’s representative that he was buying the whisky for the purpose of selling it in Georgia in violation of the prohibition law: Held, that the contract was based upon an immoral and illegal consideration, and could not be enforced.

2. The court, sitting by consent without the intervention of a jury, did not err in rendering a judgment in favor of the defendant.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Crigler & Crigler Co. v. Laramore, 88 S.E. 901, 18 Ga. App. 132, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 167 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

88 S.E. 901 (Crigler & Crigler Co. v. Laramore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jones v. Lowman
70 S.E.2d 122 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1952)
Farmers & Merchants Bank v. Miller
141 S.E. 419 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)
Commercial Bank v. Cohen
131 S.E. 117 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)