Crider v. Matthews
123 S.E. 918, 32 Ga. App. 497, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 497
This text of 123 S.E. 918 (Crider v. Matthews) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Crider v. Matthews, 123 S.E. 918, 32 Ga. App. 497, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 497 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924).
Opinion
Under all the particular facts of the case as disclosed by the record, the verdict was authorized by the evidence; and there is no substantial merit in the special grounds of the motion for a new trial. The overruling of the motion was not error.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
123 S.E. 918, 32 Ga. App. 497, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 497, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crider-v-matthews-gactapp-1924.