Crider v. Hughes
This text of 135 S.E. 491 (Crider v. Hughes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Under section 2 of the act of 1925 as to the municipal court of Atlanta (Ga. L. 1925, pp. 370, 386), the writ of certiorari does not lie to an original judgment rendered by one of the judges of that court. See, in this connection, the case of Orr v. Southern Acceptance [83]*83Co., 162 Ga. 400 (134 S. E. 80), where it was held that the legislature had constitutional power to enact this provision of the act.
2. The judge of the superior court therefore properly refused to sanction a petition for certiorari, which complained of such a judgment rendered by one of the trial judges of the Pulton section of the municipal court of Atlanta. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
135 S.E. 491, 36 Ga. App. 82, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 771, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crider-v-hughes-gactapp-1926.