Crider v. Hughes

135 S.E. 491, 36 Ga. App. 82, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 771
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided October 29, 1926·No. 17605·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Stephens, J.

1. Under section 2 of the act of 1925 as to the municipal court of Atlanta (Ga. L. 1925, pp. 370, 386), the writ of certiorari does not lie to an original judgment rendered by one of the judges of that court. See, in this connection, the case of Orr v. Southern Acceptance [83]*83Co., 162 Ga. 400 (134 S. E. 80), where it was held that the legislature had constitutional power to enact this provision of the act.

Decided October 29, 1926. W. A. James, for plaintiff in error.

2. The judge of the superior court therefore properly refused to sanction a petition for certiorari, which complained of such a judgment rendered by one of the trial judges of the Pulton section of the municipal court of Atlanta. Judgment affirmed.

Jenhins, P. J., and Bell, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Crider v. Hughes, 135 S.E. 491, 36 Ga. App. 82, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 771 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

135 S.E. 491 (Crider v. Hughes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rose v. Mayor of Thunderbolt
72 S.E.2d 823 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1952)
City Investment Co. v. Crawley
199 S.E. 747 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1938)
Von Schmidt v. Noland Co.
169 S.E. 11 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1933)
Holloman v. Southland Loan & Investment Co.
138 S.E. 862 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)