Criddle v. Lewis
This text of Criddle v. Lewis (Criddle v. Lewis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION DANTE CRIDDLE, ) Plaintiff, VS. Case No. 1:19-cv-00079-MTS JASON LEWIS, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s pro se Motion in which he seeks to receive an entire copy of the file in this case. Doc. [130]. Because Plaintiff is represented in this matter, see Doc. [114], the Court will not accept pro se motions from Plaintiff. See, e.g., Abdullah v. United States, 240 F.3d 683, 686 (8th Cir. 2001); McCaw v. United States, No. 4:05-cv-114-CE]J, 2011 WL 720047, at *4 (E.D. Mo. Feb. 22, 2011); United States v. Williams, No. 407-cr-0739- AGF, 2008 WL 11417373, at *1 (E.D. Mo. Aug. 19, 2008). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's pro se Motion, Doc. [130], is DENIED. Dated this 5th day of November, 2021. ue UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Criddle v. Lewis, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/criddle-v-lewis-moed-2021.