Crichlow v. Equitable Life Assurance Society

138 So. 481, 103 Fla. 959
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided December 22, 1931·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appeal in this case is from an order overruling a demurrer to bill of complaint, the purpose of which bill was to foreclose a mortgage. There was a motion to dismiss the appeal for several reasons. To 'determine the merits of that ground of the motion which alleges,

“It is apparent' upon the face of the record that said appeal is taken against good faith and merely for delay, contrary to the provisions of section 2920 Revised General Statutes of Florida”,

it is necessary for us to consider the bill of complaint and the questions raised by the demurrer. Upon consideration *960 of these questions it is apparent that the demurrer was without merit and was properly overruled.

The motion to dismiss is denied and the order from which the appeal is taken is affirmed, with leave to the chancellor to amend said order so as to allow the defendants in the court below to plead to or answer the complainant's bill within such reasonable time as the chancellor may fix.

Buford, C.J., and Ellis and Brown, J.J., concur.

Whitfield, P.J., and Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur in the opinion and judgment'.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Crichlow v. Equitable Life Assurance Society, 138 So. 481, 103 Fla. 959 (Fla. 1931).

138 So. 481 (Crichlow v. Equitable Life Assurance Society) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McClain v. FLA. PAROLE & PROBATION COM'N
416 So. 2d 1209 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Crichlow v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States
180 So. 382 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1938)
Crichlow v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States
152 So. 849 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1933)