Cribbs v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Cribbs v. State

745 So. 2d 582, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 16716, 1999 WL 1136665

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 14, 1999

DocketNo. 99-357

StatusPublished

This text of 745 So. 2d 582 (Cribbs v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cribbs v. State, 745 So. 2d 582, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 16716, 1999 WL 1136665 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges an order of restitution entered by the trial court after the notice of appeal had divested the trial court of its jurisdiction. Because the trial court lacked jurisdiction to enter the restitution order, we reverse that order. See Brantley v. State, 723 So.2d 909 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); Pearson v. State, 686 So.2d 721 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). On remand, the trial court may conduct another hearing and again impose restitution.

ALLEN, WEBSTER and BROWNING, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges an order of restitution entered by the trial court after the notice of appeal had divested the trial court of its jurisdiction. Because the trial court lacked jurisdiction to enter the restitution order, we reverse that order. See Brantley v. State, 723 So.2d 909 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); Pearson v. State, 686 So.2d 721 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). On remand, the trial court may conduct another hearing and again impose restitution.

ALLEN, WEBSTER and BROWNING, JJ., CONCUR.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

745 So. 2d 582, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 16716, 1999 WL 1136665, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cribbs-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack