Cribbs v. State
745 So. 2d 582, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 16716, 1999 WL 1136665
Opinion
The appellant challenges an order of restitution entered by the trial court after the notice of appeal had divested the trial court of its jurisdiction. Because the trial court lacked jurisdiction to enter the restitution order, we reverse that order. See Brantley v. State, 723 So.2d 909 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); Pearson v. State, 686 So.2d 721 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). On remand, the trial court may conduct another hearing and again impose restitution.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cribbs v. State, 745 So. 2d 582, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 16716, 1999 WL 1136665 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).
745 So. 2d 582 (Cribbs v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pearson v. State
686 So. 2d 721 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Brantley v. State
723 So. 2d 909 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)