Cribbs v. Mackey

23 Fla. Supp. 12
CourtCircuit Court of the 11th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Miami-Dade County
DecidedNovember 4, 1963
DocketNo. 63-C-7328
StatusPublished

This text of 23 Fla. Supp. 12 (Cribbs v. Mackey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Circuit Court of the 11th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Miami-Dade County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cribbs v. Mackey, 23 Fla. Supp. 12 (Fla. Super. Ct. 1963).

Opinion

HAROLD R. VANN, Circuit Judge.

This cause coming on to be heard on the plaintiffs’ motion to strike the affirmative defense contained in the answer of the defendant Dade National Bank of Miami, and the court being [14]*14otherwise fully advised in the premises, upon consideration thereof,

It is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiffs’ motion to strike the affirmative defense contained in the answer of the defendant Dade National Bank of Miami be and the same is hereby granted without leave to amend, and the ground for said ruling is that the “Agreement Not to Encumber or Transfer Property” attached to said defendant’s affirmative defense does not constitute a lien against the property which is the subject matter of plaintiffs’ foreclosure action.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 Fla. Supp. 12, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cribbs-v-mackey-flacirct11mia-1963.