Criaris v. Weber
158 A.D.2d 502, 551 N.Y.S.2d 837, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1777
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 13, 1990·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Aii examination of the record leads us to conclude that the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in granting the plaintiff’s motion to substitute the executor of the estate of Fannie Criaris as a party plaintiff in place of Fannie Criaris and in allowing the late filing of a notice of medical malpractice action (see, Egrini v Brookhaven Mem. Hosp., 133 AD2d 610; Tewari v Tsoutsouras, 75 NY2d 1). Mangano, J. P., Kunzeman, Eiber and Hooper, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Criaris v. Weber, 158 A.D.2d 502, 551 N.Y.S.2d 837, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1777 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).
158 A.D.2d 502 (Criaris v. Weber) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Encalada v. City of New York
280 A.D.2d 578 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Rocha Troussier y Asociados, S.C. v. Rivero
184 A.D.2d 398 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Mullen v. Flushing Hospital
161 A.D.2d 748 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)