Criaris v. Weber
This text of 158 A.D.2d 502 (Criaris v. Weber) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Aii examination of the record leads us to conclude that the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in granting the plaintiff’s motion to substitute the executor of the estate of Fannie Criaris as a party plaintiff in place of Fannie Criaris and in allowing the late filing of a notice of medical malpractice action (see, Egrini v Brookhaven Mem. Hosp., 133 AD2d 610; Tewari v Tsoutsouras, 75 NY2d 1). Mangano, J. P., Kunzeman, Eiber and Hooper, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
158 A.D.2d 502, 551 N.Y.S.2d 837, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1777, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/criaris-v-weber-nyappdiv-1990.