Crewse v. Hernandez

Missouri Court of Appeals

Crewse v. Hernandez

805 S.W.2d 685, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 47, 1991 WL 619

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 8, 1991·No. No. 57933·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

In this vehicular negligence case, plaintiff appeals the jury verdict for defendant.

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

[686]*686The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

In this vehicular negligence case, plaintiff appeals the jury verdict for defendant.

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

[686]*686The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Crewse v. Hernandez, 805 S.W.2d 685, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 47, 1991 WL 619 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

805 S.W.2d 685 (Crewse v. Hernandez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.