Crews v. State
This text of 233 S.E.2d 60 (Crews v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant was convicted of robbery. He brings this appeal solely on the general grounds, contending that inconsistencies and contradictions in the testimony of the state’s witnesses render the evidence insufficient to support a verdict of guilty.
"Conflicts in the testimony of the witnesses, including the state’s witnesses, is a matter of credibility for the jury to resolve. [Cits.] As long as there is some evidence, even though contradicted, to support each fact necessary to make out the state’s case, the jury’s verdict will be upheld.” Searcy v. State, 236 Ga. 789, 790 (225 SE2d 311). The evidence was sufficient to support the jury’s findings of guilt.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
233 S.E.2d 60, 141 Ga. App. 240, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 1851, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crews-v-state-gactapp-1977.