Crews v. State Ex Rel. Patterson

95 So. 921, 209 Ala. 699
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedFebruary 8, 1923
Docket4 Div. 945.
StatusPublished

This text of 95 So. 921 (Crews v. State Ex Rel. Patterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Crews v. State Ex Rel. Patterson, 95 So. 921, 209 Ala. 699 (Ala. 1923).

Opinion

THOMAS, J.

The condemnation, in equity, was sought of an undivided interest in lands held by joint owners, under section 12, p. 12, Acts 1919.

The law as to leased premises was the subject of discussion in State ex rel. Attorney General v. Jebeles, 206 Ala. 161, 89 South. 547, and the burden of proof in such matter and the necessity of specific description of the premises sought to be forfeited were dealt with in Johnson v. State, 205 Ala. 294, 87 South. 815.

It is sufficient to say of the evidence that the same has been read and carefully considered, and we are of the opinion that the state has discharged the burden imposed by the law.

The decree of the circuit court, in equity, is affirmed. Affirmed.

ANDERSON, -C. J., and McCLELLAN and SOMERVILLE, Jj., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. Jebeles
89 So. 547 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1921)
Johnson v. State
87 So. 815 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 So. 921, 209 Ala. 699, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crews-v-state-ex-rel-patterson-ala-1923.