Crews v. Moore

579 So. 2d 1334, 1991 Ala. LEXIS 328, 1991 WL 82104
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided April 19, 1991·No. 1900118·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

SHORES, Justice.

John D. Crews, Harold K. Payne, Nickie Van Davis, Daniel B. Stinnett, and Jerry L. Tolbert, property owners in the Lakeside Estate Subdivision, Limestone County, sued Timothy L. Moore, also a property owner, seeking injunctive relief. They sought to have Moore remove the mobile home he had placed on his lot in Lakeside Estate Subdivision on the grounds that it was a “temporary structure/trailer” and thus prohibited under restrictive covenants applicable to the subdivision.

The trial court denied the plaintiffs’ request for injunctive relief on the authority of Frander & Frander, Inc. v. Griffen, 457 So.2d 375 (Ala.1984). The plaintiffs appeal.

We agree with the conclusion reached by the trial court. The mobile home that the plaintiffs seek to have removed has been made a part of the realty by being anchored to the ground; porches and decks have been added. It is therefore not a temporary structure prohibited by the restrictions.

The appellants have not shown any error requiring reversal. Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

HORNSBY, C.J., and MADDOX, HOUSTON and KENNEDY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Crews v. Moore, 579 So. 2d 1334, 1991 Ala. LEXIS 328, 1991 WL 82104 (Ala. 1991).

579 So. 2d 1334 (Crews v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tucker v. Wolfe
968 P.2d 179 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1998)
Whaley v. O.C. Harrison
624 So. 2d 516 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1993)