Crews v. Moore
This text of 579 So. 2d 1334 (Crews v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
John D. Crews, Harold K. Payne, Nickie Van Davis, Daniel B. Stinnett, and Jerry L. Tolbert, property owners in the Lakeside Estate Subdivision, Limestone County, sued Timothy L. Moore, also a property owner, seeking injunctive relief. They sought to have Moore remove the mobile home he had placed on his lot in Lakeside Estate Subdivision on the grounds that it was a “temporary structure/trailer” and thus prohibited under restrictive covenants applicable to the subdivision.
The trial court denied the plaintiffs’ request for injunctive relief on the authority of Frander & Frander, Inc. v. Griffen, 457 So.2d 375 (Ala.1984). The plaintiffs appeal.
We agree with the conclusion reached by the trial court. The mobile home that the plaintiffs seek to have removed has been made a part of the realty by being anchored to the ground; porches and decks have been added. It is therefore not a temporary structure prohibited by the restrictions.
The appellants have not shown any error requiring reversal. Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
579 So. 2d 1334, 1991 Ala. LEXIS 328, 1991 WL 82104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crews-v-moore-ala-1991.