Crews v. Hanson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Crews v. Hanson

111 S.E. 222, 28 Ga. App. 355, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 509

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMarch 8, 1922

Docket13085

StatusPublished

This text of 111 S.E. 222 (Crews v. Hanson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crews v. Hanson, 111 S.E. 222, 28 Ga. App. 355, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 509 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

Hanson sued Crews for the alleged value of a certain crop which Hanson pleaded that Crews had purchased from him. Crews defended and asserted that he did not purchase the crop as alleged. Upon conflicting evidence, the jury found a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. The charge of the court was adjusted to the pleadings and evidence, and for no reason assigned are the excerpts complained of harmful. The verdict of the jury has the approval of the trial judge; and for no reason assigned was it error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

■Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur,

Complaint; from city court of Carrollton ■— Judge Hood. October 27, 1921.

James Beall, for plaintiff in error. Willis Smith, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

Hanson sued Crews for the alleged value of a certain crop which Hanson pleaded that Crews had purchased from him. Crews defended and asserted that he did not purchase the crop as alleged. Upon conflicting evidence, the jury found a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. The charge of the court was adjusted to the pleadings and evidence, and for no reason assigned are the excerpts complained of harmful. The verdict of the jury has the approval of the trial judge; and for no reason assigned was it error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

■Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur,

Complaint; from city court of Carrollton ■— Judge Hood. October 27, 1921.

James Beall, for plaintiff in error. Willis Smith, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

111 S.E. 222, 28 Ga. App. 355, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 509, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crews-v-hanson-gactapp-1922.