Crews v. First Transit

196 F. App'x 154
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 28, 2006·No. No. 06-1051·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Randolph Crews seeks to appeal the dismissal of his complaint without prejudice for failure to state a claim. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Crews seeks to appeal [155]*155is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1067 (4th Cir.1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Crews v. First Transit, 196 F. App'x 154 (4th Cir. 2006).

196 F. App'x 154 (Crews v. First Transit) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related