Crews Oil Co. v. Superior Oil Co.

319 F.2d 532
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
DecidedAugust 7, 1963
DocketNo. 7245
StatusPublished

This text of 319 F.2d 532 (Crews Oil Co. v. Superior Oil Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Crews Oil Co. v. Superior Oil Co., 319 F.2d 532 (10th Cir. 1963).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment on stipulated facts, wherein the trial Court refused to cancel part of an oil and gas lease, which appellant contends expired, for nondevelopment during its primary term. The appellant seeks to factually distinguish this case from Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company v. Isaacson, 10 Cir., 255 F.2d 669; Whitaker v. Texaco, Inc., 10 Cir., 283 F.2d 169; Cox v. Gulf Oil Corporation, 10 Cir., 301 F.2d 122; and Clovis v. Pacific Northwest Pipeline Corporation, 140 Colo. 552, 345 P.2d 729. But, we think this case is indistinguishably similar, and the judgment is Affirmed, on authority of those cases.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
319 F.2d 532, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crews-oil-co-v-superior-oil-co-ca10-1963.