Crew v. State
117 So. 924, 22 Ala. App. 665
This text of 117 So. 924 (Crew v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Crew v. State, 117 So. 924, 22 Ala. App. 665 (Ala. Ct. App. 1928).
Opinion
Defendant was convicted on a charge of violating the prohibition law and appeals. There is no question of merit presented by the bill of exceptions. The sentence is erroneous, in that the term fixed is not definite. The judgment is affirmed, and the cause is remanded to the circuit court for proper sentence. Affirmed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
117 So. 924, 22 Ala. App. 665, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crew-v-state-alactapp-1928.