Crew v. State

117 So. 924, 22 Ala. App. 665
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided May 22, 1928·No. 6 Div. 405.·Published

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

Defendant was convicted on a charge of violating the prohibition law and appeals. There is no question of merit presented by the bill of exceptions. The sentence is erroneous, in that the term fixed is not definite. The judgment is affirmed, and the cause is remanded to the circuit court for proper sentence. Affirmed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Crew v. State, 117 So. 924, 22 Ala. App. 665 (Ala. Ct. App. 1928).

117 So. 924 (Crew v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.