Crew v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Crew v. State

102 So. 920, 20 Ala. App. 676

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided January 13, 1925·No. 6 Div. 616.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

It is insisted in brief of counsel that there was not sufficient evidence to submit the question of the guilt or innocence of the defendant to the jury. As to this we are of the opinion that sufficient facts were testified to by the witness for the state to au *677 thorize a verdict of guilt. But, whether this be so or not, there is no request for the general affirmative charge, nor is the ruling of the court invoked in any manner, so as to present the question for review. Errors complained of must appear in the record, without which they will not be considered. We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMFORD, J.

It is insisted in brief of counsel that there was not sufficient evidence to submit the question of the guilt or innocence of the defendant to the jury. As to this we are of the opinion that sufficient facts were testified to by the witness for the state to au *677 thorize a verdict of guilt. But, whether this be so or not, there is no request for the general affirmative charge, nor is the ruling of the court invoked in any manner, so as to present the question for review. Errors complained of must appear in the record, without which they will not be considered. We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.

Crew v. State, 102 So. 920, 20 Ala. App. 676 (Ala. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

102 So. 920 (Crew v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related